That brought me to phase three. After Skakel’s conviction that
        June, I wrote a book about the murder. It was called “Conviction,” and
        it focused on my relationship with Garr, describing how we had each worked
        separately and together to solve the case. 
      The book was published in 2004. In 2005, it won the Mystery Writers
        Association’s first Edgar first award for non-fiction. 
       Fast-forward to last week and Skakel’s attempt to get a new trial.
        First witness was his cousin, Robert Kennedy Jr., who testified he had
        discovered new evidence: Martha’s real killer, he stated, was not
        Michael but two black men, never before identified by the police or by
        witnesses. RFK Jr. based his conclusions on a statement by one Gitano
        [Tony] Bryant, a cousin of basketball star Kobe. Gitano gave a deposition
        but refused to testify in court. 
       Kennedy also testified to a rift between Skakel and the Kennedy family,
        which began, he said, after Skakel exposed the sexual relationship between
        Kennedy’s brother Michael and his teenage baby-sitter. At the time,
        both Michael Kennedy and Michael Skakel were working in the Massachusetts
        gubernatorial campaign of RFK Jr.’s older brother Joseph. The babysitter
        scandal helped defeat brother Joe. One can only speculate how Joe feels
        about his brother, RFK Jr., testifying for the man who wrecked his candidacy. 
       As for Michael Kennedy, he died the following year in a freak ski accident
        in Aspen, Colorado. One can only speculate about how RFK Jr.’s
        mother, Ethel Kennedy, feels about the death of her son and whether she
        holds Michael Skakel at all responsible. Apparently, she doesn’t
        as she appeared as a spectator when RFK Jr. testified for him.
       RFK Jr. also testified that “not one reporter” involved
        in the Moxley case had followed up his lead of the two black men as Martha’s
        killers. 
       But that’s not true. He and I had scheduled a meeting in August,
        2003, at about the time he made his information public. But the day of
        our meeting, he canceled, claiming I was too close to Garr, whom Michael
        Skakel regards as his nemesis. 
       Garr was the reason I was subpoenaed to testify. Skakel’s new
        lawyers tried to say he had focused on Michael not because he was guilty
        but because Garr had made a secret book deal with me before the trial.
        According to Skakel’s former lawyer, Mickey Sherman, who also testified,
        the purveyor of that canard was the celebrity writer Dominick Dunne,
        who also claimed to have solved Martha’s murder.
       So, let’s see. Michael was convicted in June, 2002. My book contract
        was signed with Judith Regan at Harper-Collins that September. My contract
        with Garr — he and I had a 50-50 split  — was signed in February,
        2003. All this happened after Michael’s conviction.
       The book barely made back its small advance. As they say, 50 per cent
        of zero is zero. 
       Asked by Skakel’s lawyer, Hubert Santos, how much I paid Garr,
        I said I didn’t recall the exact amount but thought it was probably
        one one-thousandth of what the Skakel family was paying him.