The NYPD and Judith Miller
      May 14, 2007
       Upset by Jim Dwyer’s articles in the New York Times, detailing
        the NYPD world-wide, possibly illegal, spying on non-violent groups before
        the 2004 Republican National Convention, the department sought a sympathetic
        ear.
       It found one in the discredited former Times reporter, Judith Miller,
        whom the Times forced to resign, largely because of her faulty reporting
        on the Iraq war. 
       Miller was given rare access to the department’s top officials.
       She said she also reviewed “600-plus pages of still-secret [NYPD]
        intelligence documents” — describing them as “raw intelligence
        files.” Presumably these were the same files used by Dwyer, who
        appears to have obtained them from sources outside the NYPD.
       The NYPD then denied any role in Miller’s obtaining those files,
        and demanded an investigation into who leaked them to Dwyer.
       Miller’s article, defending the NYPD’s surveillance at
        the RNC, appeared in the Wall Street Journal on May 3.
       “Stung by the [Times’ spying] criticism,” she began, “Police
        Commissioner Ray W. Kelly, David Cohen, the Deputy Police Commissioner
        for Intelligence, and Paul J. Browne, the NYPD press spokesman, outlined
        in interviews the nature of the police’s concerns, its conduct
        and the goals of its intelligence surveillance.”
       Those documents, she writes, “list numerous peaceful organizations
        and individuals planning to attend the RNC, including three elected officials,
        street theater companies, church groups, antiwar organizations, environmentalists,
        and .people opposed to the death penalty.”
       She quotes Cohen — who was a senior CIA official before joining
        the NYPD — as saying that the “‘co-mingled threat’  of ‘terrorism,
        anarchist violence and unlawful civil disobedience’ drove both
        the surveillance program and the policies of mass arrest and blanket
        fingerprinting”  of 1,806 persons at the convention. Virtually
        all of them were released with all charges dismissed. 
       Miller writes that the  “intelligence documents appear focused
        mainly on estimating the number of and motivations of people who were
        planning to attend the convention as well as potential threats to the
        gathering, its delegates and the police.”
       Although those threats appear least important in her recounting, the
        bulk of her article quotes Cohen justifying the police surveillance because
        of the terrorism threat. 
       Citing Cohen, she writes: “Since 9/11, he said, the city has
        experienced or prevented 11 separate terrorist plots…. The 18-month
        period between the selecting of New York and the convention itself was ‘the
        most intense threat period of the post-September 11 era to date,’ Mr.
        Cohen said. 
       “Six terrorist attacks by al Qaeda-related or inspired groups
        in far-flung Casablanca, Jakarta, Istanbul, Moscow and Madrid killed
        nearly 300 people and wounded more than 3,000,” Miller writes.
       She herself refers to Madison Square Garden, where the convention was
        held, as “ground zero” to the protestors.
       Now let’s see: 
       
Miller’s
        articles before the Iraq war quoted sources confirming that Saddam possessed
        weapons of mass destruction, had links to Al Qaeda and all sorts of other
        nonsense. 
       
It
        was Dwyer, whom The Times sent to Lebanon, who exposed what he termed “the
        rotten foundation” of Miller’s reporting. 
       
Miller
        subsequently spent a couple of months in jail, protecting the confidentiality
        of Lewis [Scooter] Libby, an operative of Vice President Cheney. Libby
        was subsequently convicted of perjury over his discrediting a critic
        of the Iraq war.
      
The
        New York Civil Liberties Union—  which has those 600 pages of secret
        police spying files — has sought to be able to publicly release
        them.