No  Longer God
         July 19, 2010
         Here are eight lessons from Ray Kelly’s databank.
         LESSON 1. KELLY IS NO  LONGER GOD. Governor David Paterson’s decision to scrap Kelly’s databank of  people not arrested in police stop-and-frisks is his first public smack-down in  eight years as police commissioner. 
         True, Kelly has received a couple of “bitch-slaps,” as they are  called in the police department. In Feb. 2003, after police arrested 274 anti-war  protestors, the Civil Liberties Union shamed Kelly into purging the department’s  “Demonstration Debriefing Form” databank. That databank had listed the protestors’  names, the names of their friends, their political affiliations, schools they  had attended, organizations they belonged to, their opinions about Israel and  Palestine, and their whereabouts on 9/11. 
         Detectives had questioned the protestors in their prison  cells. Kelly, a non-practicing lawyer, called the questioning “debriefings” and  “part of the arrest process” — provoking a chortle from federal judge Charles Haight.  The episode led Haight to reinstate tighter restrictions on the department’s  spying on political groups. But Haight’s courtroom language was so florid and convoluted  few could understand what he meant.
         In vetoing Kelly’s stop-and-frisk databank, Paterson not  only humiliated Kelly, but sounded like Abraham Lincoln: “There is a principle —  which is compatible with the presumption of innocence, and is deeply ingrained  in our sense of justice — that individuals wrongly accused of a crime should  suffer neither stigma nor adverse consequences by virtue of an arrest or  criminal accusation not resulting in conviction.” 
         LESSON 2. DON’T COUNT  OUT THE CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION. It recently took it on the chin when a  federal appeals panel overruled two lower court judges and declared the NYPD’s internal  spying documents on political protestors off-limits to public scrutiny. But its  bond with the New York Times and other liberal groups remains formidable. 
         As it did in 2003 with the Demonstration Debriefing Form, it  provided raw data to the Times, this time about the department’s nearly three  million documented stop-and-frisks since 2003. More than 88 per cent of the  stops never led to an arrest or a summons, the data showed. And 90 per cent of  those stopped were non-white. 
         LESSON 3. NOTHING AND NOBODY CAN TOP THE NEW YORK TIMES. Although it appears to hibernate for part of the year, there is nothing more  dangerous to a politician or a police commissioner than an awakened New York Times. 
         The Times took the Civil Liberties Union data, provided the  computerized expertise, and then revealed that, in a largely black, eight-block  area of Brownsville in Brooklyn, police officers made an average of 93 stops a  year for every 100 residents. Men, ages 15 to 34, were stopped an average of  five times a year. 
         If just that factoid appears in the Times, and you are  Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, you’ve got a problem.
         LESSON 4. KELLY’S  CREDIBILITY IS A DONUT HOLE. For the first time in eight years, people are  questioning Kelly’s credibility. In fighting crime, a former top NYPD official says,  “The databank makes no sense. Why does he [Kelly] want to keep them [the data] forever  when they [suspects] lose their value pretty quickly. They’re like perfume.  Someone in the databank five years ago is no help to anyone.”
         In an apparently desperate second meeting with Paterson,  Kelly brought summaries of 170 cases — including 17 murders, 36 robberies and eight  sex crimes — that he said the databank was instrumental in solving. Here is the  Times’ description of Kelly’s claims:
         “In many of the cases, however, the summaries provide strong  evidence that the stop-and-frisk data played a less than essential role — and  sometimes hardly any role at all.”
         The Times then dismissed a Kelly summary in which he argued  that the databank was key to solving a murder in Brownsville on June 4, where a  man leapt from a car in broad daylight and fired gunshots into a van, killing  the driver. After witnesses provided the suspect’s name, police, using stop-and-frisk  data, found that he had been stopped nearby two days earlier.
         The Times: “But in the next sentence, the summary states,  ‘Computer checks on the name further revealed a violent criminal history with  an address in Brownsville…. Though the governor did not refer to this case  specifically, it was one of many examples in Mr. Kelly’s summary where it was  hard to see how the database played a ‘breakthrough role.’”