He Can’t Stay Away
January 19, 2015
Mayor de Blasio can’t seem to stay away  from the Rev. Al Sharpton. 
 According  to the mayor’s public schedule under the heading: “Guidance for Monday, January  19th, 2015”: “Monday afternoon, the mayor will deliver remarks  at the National Action Network Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Policy Forum in  Manhattan.” 
The National Action Network is, of course,  Sharpton’s organization. 
So why does the mayor continue to support  the most polarizing figure in the city, if not the country? 
Why, despite his troubles with the NYPD — whose antipathy towards Sharpton as a cop-hater has been institutionalized in  the police culture — does the mayor continue to attend his events? 
On the other hand, what’s so intrinsically  bad about attending an event at Sharpton’s joint? 
De Blasio’s predecessor, Michael  Bloomberg, did it — and was praised for it. His predecessor Rudy  Giuliani refused to  — and was criticized for that. 
Other than the NY Post, did anyone  criticize President Obama and his wife Michelle after a White House  representative read their congratulatory letter to Sharpton at his 60th  birthday bash at the Four Seasons last fall? 
Did anyone criticize Hillary Clinton after  Sharpton announced in a press release that she, too, had called him with  congratulations? 
And what about Gov. Andrew Cuomo? He not  only attended the party but said that the Rev “still has that sense of outrage  at injustice. He’s no longer New York City’s Sharpton, he’s the nation’s  Sharpton.” 
The mayor also attended. He said: “The  more people criticize him, the more I want to hang out with him.” 
For that, many, including NYPD  Confidential criticized him.
That party, we might add, was where a top  female aide to the Rev at the National Action Network went off to spend the  night with Sharpton’s longtime lawyer Sanford Rubenstein and later claimed he’d  raped her. 
After initially saying he didn’t know who  to believe, the Rev dropped Rubenstein. The Manhattan District Attorney said  there was not enough evidence to indict.